Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @8ZLD38X from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

well yes but what we need to do is that they need too test it out by one by a month and then vote

 @8ZM7993 from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZGRFS4 from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

no, i think we should try to convince other country especially countries coming into using oils and natural resources

 @9334YP3answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and the government should sanction all countries that remain a party to it.

 @8YZTXJBanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but we should be finding ways to hold other countries to the same agreement for the sake of the environment’s wellbeing.

 @8YMZ7Y3 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @gabehwknsanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but a more meaningful agreement with aggressive standards and enforcement should be created

 @8MF33G5answered…4yrs4Y

Not until we have plenty of clean energy sources that can power everything.

 @8YT2C43answered…3yrs3Y

While I feel like all the countries in the Agreement should be held on the same level, I do not believe that the U.S. should withdraw.

 @8YWFYZPanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, We are reducing carbon emissions at a faster rate than the vast majority of other countries

 @8ZGJXB8 from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @52P5M5Sanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but work towards holding other countries accountable, primarily china and india, withdrawing will only allow china to gain more influence over our allies

 @8QBXF92 from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but renegotiate the agreement to avoid it's effects from hurting American workers while holding other countries to the same standards

 @8GFV2CC from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4PV8YZ3answered…4yrs4Y

 @2CZSH3Lanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but we need a stronger international agreement to curb climate change with penalties for parties who don't meet the standards and trade penalties for nations that refuse to join or leave the pact.

 @895C6VC from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes. We should withdraw and be an energy exporter. People can partner with us and pay us. This industry must grow!

 @8QMQCVN from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, it is non-binding, and does little more than harbor money laundering

 @88PQ9NW from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but demand that other countries be held to equal standards according to their needs

 @95S7WDY from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8GSSFLN from Delaware  answered…4yrs4Y

I think they should stay with the Paris Climate Agreement, but at the same time, keep themselves and the people in check so we can try and solve climate change together.

 @8WCTWT2 from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Q8RMZF from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

No, we should withdraw because if we do not do something and take a stand then our earth could fail sooner or later due to climate change... Trump should take a hint the other day it was like 75 degrees in the middle of winter!!!

 @7W3SBDC from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

No. We should seek to improve it as a whole with cooperation from the other countries in it.

 @7GJCNV8 from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but replace it with an even stronger international agreement and climate provisions in trade deals

 @85QWNPG from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

No, we should work with our allies to make a more comprehensive measure for keeping countries within the agreement on track to eliminate 50% or more of their polluting co2 by 2030.

 @86N5Z35 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @86N5Z35 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8CQ4NFX from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes the U.S. should withdraw form the Paris Climate Agreement until it has started over and became more fair.

 @8DN3MHJ from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the PCA should be reworked to hold all countries to the same standards

  @8DN4WYN from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

We never followed the Constitution to get into it and didn't follow the Constitution to withdraw. Someone followed the law? Maybe we ought to do that before we ask this question.

 @8DR2W8T from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but I think the U.S should work hard to reduce it's carbon footprint as much as possible

 @8FG68X3 from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8FC78TK from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

No, we should never put our manufacturing industry before the climate NEVER

 @8GMR5G7 from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

No, so that more countries (by this I mean the U.S.) are able to help protect the natural environment.

 @8GLCRKQ from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8HJ6ZY7 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No but use re-entry as leverage to renegotiate so that other countries also pay their fair share

 @8HK774D from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but we should push for all countries to be held to a high standard.

 @8HJ4B4M from Montana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8HQTH28 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8HVQ8RT from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

The US does not need to follow the Paris Climate Agreement, but should hold itslef accountable towards creating a net zero future.

 @8J4798Y from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8J958XC from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KCPC7C from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8L7S8HZ from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8LMSRC6 from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8M657DV from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

I believe the agreement should be put on hold until nuclear energy is a viable option nationwide in the United States.

 @8MR6ZZG from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8MZ79MJanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8NBL599 from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NCCM3F from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NSG2FG from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NRQS6Z from Nevada  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PBTNXK from California  answered…4yrs4Y

The Paris Climate Accord will not do enough to help end climate change but that does not mean we should ;leave it we should just reform it into what we need in order for the world to survive.

 @8Q2BXYC from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QKJ7R9 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, we should find ways to decrease climate change that work for us monetarily, rather than against us. The Paris Climate agreement costs $4.4 trillion. That's too much. We need to spend less and get out of debt as much as we can.

 @8QN8L65 from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QXGYWK from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QWC9GD from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but threaten to leave if changes are not made to the other country's restrictions

 @8QZKH7B from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RB2K9D from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RJ9QC2 from Nebraska  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RS5BVG from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, we need to be very active participants, continue to implement eco-friendly policies and especially provide more incentives for renewable energy. Big energy companies have no incentive now because non-renewables like coal and natural gas are so damn inexpensive.

 @8T2Z93T from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8T9KVZK from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

  @8TKFNNS from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TH2QWQ from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TWB9FX from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but all countries in the agreement need to be held to the same standard.

 @8V29GDP from Washington D.C.  answered…4yrs4Y

No we should not. The stupid US government is destroying our world for a quick buck we should be doing not just the bare minimum laid out in the Paris Agreement but also so so much more

 @8VMNXQF from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but try to compromise or shift other countries to a consistent standard.

 @8VWCTBJ from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

I know nothing about this, I can't answer this without knowing more about it.

 @8WBMHFW from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, because wwe will then cause the climate change to happen faster and more effectively.